GAYATRI SEVA SANSTHAN,UDAIPUR vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the scope of enquiry at the stage of granting registration is limited to the objects and prima facie genuineness of activities. Deficiencies in documentation, without positive material disproving genuineness, cannot be the sole ground for rejection.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable institution, applied for registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G. The CIT(E) rejected both applications, citing incomplete documentation, unverified activities, and opaque financial affairs, particularly noting the maintenance of 32 bank accounts with only one statement provided.
What were the issues?
Whether rejection of registration under section 12AB and consequent rejection of approval under section 80G were justified based on perceived deficiencies in documentation and verification of activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH JODHPUR
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER: MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM
These two appeals filed by the assessee arise from two separate orders, both dated 25.03.2026, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [“CIT(E)”], in Form No. 10AD. Since both appeals involve common facts and the rejection of approval under section 80G is consequential to the rejection of registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
The grounds raised by the assessee in ITA No. 576/Jodh/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026