DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. JOHNSON LIFTS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of advance receipts for Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMCs). The assessee recognized AMC income proportionately over the contract period, while the Assessing Officer (AO) sought to tax the entire amount in the year of receipt.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 43CB of the Income-tax Act, applicable for the assessment years in question, mandates recognition of revenue over the contract period for service contracts. Therefore, the proportionate recognition of AMC income was legally correct.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether advance AMC charges should be taxed in the year of receipt or spread over the contract period, considering the applicability of Section 43CB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM : These two appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the orders dated 11.09.2025 for the Assessment year (A.Y.) 2020-21 and 10.09.2025 for the A.Y. 2018-19 both passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”], arising from the assessme
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43CB
- Sumit Garden Grove Construction LLP, Mumbai vs Circle 41(3)(1), MumbaiITA 510/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs Johnson Lifts Private Limited, ChennaiITA 3401/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Devipriya Enterprises, Pune vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(2), PuneITA 2834/PUN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT, Chennai vs M/S. Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors…ITA 1561/CHNY/2025[2016]Status: Disposed14 Jan 2026
- Bsr Builders Engineers Contractors, Chennai vs DCIT, Central Circle-2(3), ChennaiITA 1312/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes.Karnataka · 7 Oct 2026
- Dolphin Motor Agency, Cuttack vs. Additional Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal), Central Zone-Ii, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Devendra Singh Kanyal vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Trivitron Healthcare Private LTD vs. Deputy Commissioner Division Vi CGST Central Excise Commissionerate BelapurBombay · 7 Oct 2026
- Mr Ca Mukunda vs. Mr. Ca. Shiva Prakash H SKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026