JUSTICE GOPAL SINGH PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. ITO (E) WARD 1 (4), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3482/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 August 2026AY 2021-223 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that filing Form 10B beyond the due date is directory, not mandatory. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to Section 11 exemption.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return and Form 10B beyond the due date. The lower authorities denied exemption under Section 11 on this ground.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing Form 10B disentitles the assessee from claiming exemption under Section 11.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11,Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana, CA
Hearing: 06.08.2026Pronounced: 06.08.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3482/Del/2026 Assessment Year: 2021-22 Justice Gopal Singh Public Vs. Income Tax Officer (E), Charitable Trust, New Delhi A-10, Neeti Bagh, New Delhi – 110049 PAN: AAATJ6241L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Vandana, CA Department by Sh. Zafarul Haque Tanweer, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 06.08.2026 Date of pronouncement 06.08.2026 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2021-22, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1084432894(1), dated 143(1) involving proceedings under section 143(1) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. It emerges at the outset that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authorities’ respective

ITA No.3482/Del/2026

section 143(1) processing dated 23.08.2022 as well as the CIT(A)’s lower appellate discussion, inter alia, denying section 11 exemption for the reason(s) that it had filed its return along Form 10B on 30.03.2022 i.e. beyond the “due” date thereof falling on 15.02.2022; and, therefore, holding it as not entitled for the aforesaid relief. 3. That being the case, we find no reason to sustain the Revenue’s stand supporting the same. We wish to make it clear that the instant issue has already been settled in CIT vs. Xavier Kelavani Mandal (P.) Ltd., [2014] 41 taxmann.com 184 (Guj.) that Form 10B compliance in such an instance is directory than mandatory in nature. We thus accept the assessee’s instant sole substantive ground and direct the learned Assessing Officer to frame his consequential computation as per law after verification of all the relevant facts. 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 6th August, 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (NAVEEN CHANDRA) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 27th August, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2 | P a g e

ITA No.3482/Del/2026

2.

Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

3 | P a g e

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →