PUSHPALATHA AIYAPPA,MADIKERI vs. ITO WARD MADIKERI, MADIKERI
What were the facts?
Assessees, BSNL employees who opted for VRS 2019, received retrenchment compensation. They initially offered part of it as income or claimed exemption under Section 10(10C), later seeking exemption under Section 10(10B) based on a tribunal ruling. Their appeals to the CIT(A) were dismissed on grounds of limitation and maintainability.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the delays and entertained the appeals on merits, as similar claims by BSNL employees had been allowed by various benches. The judgment of the Supreme Court in Goetze (India) Ltd. was deemed not applicable to appellate authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing appeals on grounds of limitation and maintainability, and whether retrenchment compensation received by BSNL employees under VRS is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S., ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year
Lata Muralidhar Joshi, B-02, 2nd Floor, The Income Tax ITA No. Jain Heights SOLUS-01, Officer, 2021-22 2317/Bang/2026 1st Cross, J C Road, Ward – 1 & TPS, Bengaluru – 560 027. Gulbarga. PAN: AKCPJ7098K
Mallappa Hanamanthappa Choular, The Income Tax B-02, 2nd Floor, Jain Heights ITA No. Officer, SOLUS-01, 2021-22 2321/Bang/2026 Ward – 1 & TPS, 1st Cross, J C Road, Gulbarga. Bengaluru – 560 027. PAN: AIGPC5472N
Oruganti Sailaja, No. 54, Thimma Reddy Colony, The Income Tax ITA No. 9th Main Road, Officer, 2020-21 2441/Bang/2026 Thippasandra, Circle – 1(1)(1), Bengaluru – 560 075. Bangalore. PAN: AQTPS0792A
Pushpalatha Aiyappa, Telegraphs, New Extn Madikeri, The Income Tax ITA No. Kodagu, Officer, 2020-21 2468/Bang/2026 Madikeri, Ward – Madikeri. Karnataka – 571 201. PAN: ABCPA3203G Mahendra Shet, D-3, Telecom Quarters, The Income Tax ITA No. Alevoor Road, Manipal, Officer, 2020-21 2524/Bang/2026 Udupi, Ward – 1 TPS, Karnataka – 576 104. Udupi. PAN: AHMPS6095E ITA Nos. 2317
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chandan Patra, Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Corbett Kyari Jungle Resort vs. The State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S N B Enterprises vs. The Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Sumit Bhoora vs. M/ S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Jayesh Patel vs. M/S Aasharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026