MANOJ KUMAR PROPRIETOR M/S MANOJ METALS,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT TDS, FARIDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee faced issues with TDS deduction due to suppliers' PANs being inoperative due to non-linking with Aadhaar. This led to higher TDS rates and late fees being levied. The assessee argued that the delay was beyond their control and due to external factors.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while stringent provisions exist to curb tax evasion, the department's system should have flagged inoperative PANs. The assessee is not liable for higher TDS if the deductee has declared the income and paid taxes. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh determination.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is liable for higher TDS rates and late fees when the deductee's PAN was inoperative due to non-linking with Aadhaar, and whether the department bears some responsibility for not flagging such inoperative PANs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 206AA,Section 234E,Section 194Q,Section 119(2)(b),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 201(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
PER BENCH: The above captioned three appeals are filed by the assessee directed against the order dated 14.08.2025 of the Id. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal),-7, Mumbai, [hereinafter referred to as the 'Ld. CIT(A)], )] arising out of the Order dated 06.02.2025 passed under section 154 r.w.s. 200A/206CB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) Assessing Officer, Centralized Processing Cell- TDS (hereinafter referred to as the 'AO, CPC') pertaining to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2024-25. P a g e | 2 ITA Nos.1499 to 1501/Del/2026 Manoj Kumar (Proprietor
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 206AA
- Nitesh Kumar Ganeshprasad Asati, Delhi vs TDS, Income Tax OfficeITA 3005/DEL/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- Abl Engineering Company, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 4(1), NagpurITA 696/NAG/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Manoj Kumar Proprietor M/S Manoj Metals… vs ACIT TDS, FaridabadITA 1500/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2024-25
- Manoj Kumar- Proprietor M/S Manoj Metals… vs ACIT TDS, FaridabadITA 1499/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2024-25
- Shailesh Veljibhai Paladiya, Surat vs ITO, TDS Ward-2, SuratITA 1297/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026