ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, DELHI, DELHI vs. CONCEPT WEAVERS PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) deleted the additions, finding that the loan was from an RBI-registered NBFC and that all necessary documents for identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness were provided. The amount was also repaid before reopening.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on information received from a search on other entities, alleging the assessee obtained accommodation entries of Rs. 10,55,581/-. The AO added Rs. 10,00,000/- under Section 68 and Rs. 30,000/- for commission under Section 69C.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made by the AO for alleged accommodation entries and commission were justified, considering the assessee provided documentary evidence for a loan from a registered NBFC.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal is preferred by the revenue against the order dated 10.09.2025 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for 1 short) in Appeal No: CIT(A), Delhi-29, 10769/2018-19 arising out of the assessment order dated 21.03.2023 u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by ACIT, Central Circle-25, New Delhi, for AY: 2019-20.
Heard and perused the records. The return of assesse was taken up for scrutiny assessment on the basis of high risk CRIU/VRU information received on the basis of search u/s 132 of the Act conducted on 17.11.2021 on Galaxi Group, Shri Pradeep Indra Prasad Agrawala and alleged entry provider Shri Deepak Agarwal and Himashu Verma on the basis of documents seized during search and it was allegedly found that the assesse had obtained accommodation entry of Rs.10,55,581/- and thus, based upon the information and the response of the assesse, the ld. AO had made addition of Rs.10,00,000/- u/s 68 of the Act, alleging that assesse had received an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- from non-descript companies and further addition of Rs.30,000/- was made towards commission paid u/s 69C of the Act and the interest payment was added to the income u/s 69C. Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the additions for which department is in appeal. 3. Ld. DR though supported the findings of AO, however, we find that ld. CIT(A) has taken into consideration the vital facts including that loan of Rs.10,00,000/- was from M/s LVS Financials Service Pvt. Ltd., a NBFC 2 duly registered with RBI and all basic documents with regard to establishing identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction were filed and in fact even before the reopening the amount were repaid. The conclusion drawn by ld. CIT(A) in para 6.18, thus, deserves to be sustained with regard to deletion of addition of loan of Rs.10,00,000/- and the consequential commission interest additions has been rightly deleted. We find no reason to interfere in the finding of ld. CIT(A). The ground raised by the department have no substance, the appeal of the department is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31.08.2026
Sd/- Sd/- MANISH AGARWAL ANUBHAV SHARMA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi Dated: 31.08.2026 Rohit, Sr. PS
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026