DISTRICT ELECATION OFFICE, MANDI,MANDI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDI
No AI summary yet for this case.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"ीगढ़ "ायपीठ “ए” , च"ीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH “A”, CHANDIGARH HEARING THROUGH: HYBRID MODE "ी लिलत कुमार, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी िवजय वमा" , लेखा सद" BEFORE: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR, JM & SHRI. VIJAY VARMA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 456 /Chd/ 2026 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2020-21 District Election Office बनाम The ITO Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi Mandi, Himachal Pradesh-175001 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: PTLD11892G अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Akshit Rana, Advocate (Virtual) राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 25/08/2026 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 01/09/2026 आदेश/Order PER VIJAY VARMA, A.M: This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the order of the Ld. CIT, Appeal, Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Pune dt. 03/02/2026 for the Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. In the present appeal Appellant has raised following grounds:
That in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), is not justified in partly upholding the order of the Ld. Assessing Off
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.