M/S. RAMNAGAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 (3), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2583/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 September 2026AY 2008-0923 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of purchases and the CIT(A) erred in restricting the disallowance to 12.5%. The Tribunal restored the AO's addition of 100% of the alleged bogus purchases.

What were the facts?

During a search operation, the assessee's group was found to be involved with individuals providing accommodation entries. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for alleged bogus purchases based on statements and seized materials. The CIT(A) restricted the addition to 12.5% of the purchases.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in restricting the addition for bogus purchases to 12.5% when the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 153A,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

आदेश की प्रतितलतप अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. विभागीय प्रविवनवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. सत्यावपि प्रवि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अतधकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai.

P a g e | 23

ITA No. 2583, 3137/Mum/2023 A.Y. 2008-09 M/s Ramnagar Development Corporation

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,598 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →