JSV INGREDIENT ,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC-2(2), MUMBAI

ITA 5290/MUM/2025Status: HeardITAT Mumbai07 September 2026AY 2018-1917 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘F’ BENCH

For Appellant: Shri Sukhsagar Sayal a/w, Shri Atul T Suriya
For Respondent: Ms. Sandhya Mathur
Hearing: 07/09/2026Pronounced: 07/09/2026

PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 30.06.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai, arising out of the assessment order passed under section 143(3) of 2 JSV Ingredient the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2018–19. In the various grounds raised before us, the principal grievance of the assessee relates to the applicability of section 115BBE in respect of excess stock amounting to ₹2,75,63,760 found during the course of survey and treated by the Assessing Officer as unexplained investment under section 69B. The case of the assessee is that the excess stock represented undisclosed income

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.