SHRI SADGURU DEVELOPERS,SHAPAR, RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the profit element embedded in the on-money receipts should be estimated at 10%, considering the facts and previous judicial precedents. This rate was deemed to meet the ends of justice.
What were the facts?
During a search, unaccounted cash receipts and expenses related to a real estate project were discovered. The Assessing Officer estimated profit on these unaccounted receipts at 40%, while the CIT(A) reduced it to 16%.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correct estimation of the profit element embedded in unaccounted on-money receipts. The Tribunal also considered the year-wise taxability of these receipts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 145(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM: Captioned these appeals in ITA No. 191/RJT/2025 is filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (A.Υ.) 2019-20, ITA No. 192/RJT/2025 for A.Y. 2020-21, ITA No. 193/RJT/2025 for A.Y. 2021-22, and ITA No. 194/RJT/2025 for A.Y. 2022- 23. All four appeals are directed against the common appellate order dated 21.01.2025 passed by the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026