SURESHBHAI PRAGJIBHAI PARMAR,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the validity of the reassessment proceedings hinged on the proper service of the notice under section 148. As the assessment records were not available, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification of the notice's service.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file a return of income for AY 2010-11. The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment under section 147 based on substantial cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The assessment was completed ex parte under section 144 as the assessee did not comply with notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 147 were valid due to the alleged non-service of the notice under section 148.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 250,Section 133(6),Section 271(1)(c),Section 271(1)(b)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11, is directed against the order under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘NFAC’], dated 10.10.2024, which in turn arises out of an order passed by assessing officer u/s. 144 of the Act, dated 27.12.2017. 02. Brief facts of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026