INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, YAVATMAL, YAVATMAL vs. ARUN EKNATH CHARPE, SIDDESHWAR NAGAR, YAVATMAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular, with retrospective effect, mandates that appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 60.00 lakh should not be pressed or should be withdrawn. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs. 3,29,888, which was below the revised monetary limit for filing appeals set by a CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit as per the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR ‘SMC’ BENCH, NAGPUR
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD
The captioned appeal at the instance of Revenue pertaining to A.Y. 2019-20 is directed against the order dated 19.03.2026 framed by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) arising out of Assessment order dated 10.03.2024 passed u/s. 147 r.w.s.144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
During the course of hearing, the ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that the CBDT has issued Circular No. 09 of 2018, dated 17th September, 2024 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.60.00 lakh for not filing appeals before the Tribunal. He further submitted that as the tax effect involved in the instant appea
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026