KETAN BALDEV KHANNA,MUMBAI vs. ASSESMENT UNIT, PUNE
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file a return of income despite information regarding TDS on property purchase and salary. The Assessing Officer made additions under Section 69 and for salary income after issuing notices with no response. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back for fresh adjudication. It granted the assessee one more opportunity to present evidence, emphasizing principles of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering the assessee's reasons for non-compliance, and whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194IA,Section 192,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 69,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE
Before: DR. MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
- The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of NFAC/CIT(A) passed u/sec 250 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and sustaining the additionsmade by the Assessing Officer.
The brief facts of the case are that, Income Tax Department has received information that (i) the TDS has been deducted under Section 194IA (P) of the Act on payment of ITA.No.2405/PUN/2026 KetanBaldev Khanna consideration for purchase of immovable property and(ii) TDS under Section 192 of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194IA
- Jagadish Panchal, Udaipur vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 314/JODH/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamal Namdev Nimhan, Pune vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), PuneITA 2547/PUN/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Nitesh Kumar Ganeshprasad Asati, Delhi vs TDS, Income Tax OfficeITA 3005/DEL/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- Nalin Rawat, Punjab vs ITO. Ward 6(1), Chandigarh, PunjabITA 272/CHANDI/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed12 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Kuldeep Kumar, South Delhi vs Ward 28(5), Delhi, Income Tax OfficeITA 3448/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026