NAJEEB UR REHMAN,GHAZIABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 70(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention that his services were not technical. Consequently, the assessee was directed to be assessed under Section 44AD of the Act instead of Section 44ADA.
What were the facts?
The assessee was assessed under Section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on TDS deduction under Section 194J, treating his receipts of Rs. 32,10,294/- as technical consultancy. The assessee contended that his services were in the hairstyle industry and not technical in nature.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's receipts, subjected to TDS under Section 194J, should be treated as technical consultancy for assessment under Section 44ADA or as general professional services for assessment under Section 44AD.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 44ADA,Section 44AD,Section 194J,Section 143(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM:
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2023-24, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A).NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2026-27/1090364934(1) dated 24.06.2026, involving proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961; hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’.
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authorities’ respective assessments and lower appellate findings assessing him u/s 44ADA rather than u/s 44AD
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 44ADA
- Zeenat Parween Ansari, Near Vijay Talkies… vs ITO 2.2.1 Firozabad, Dabrai, FirozabadITA 520/AGR/2026[2020-12]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2020-12
- Shagun Singhal, Ludhiana vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 899/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Olive Enterprises, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(2)(1), BangaloreITA 2547/BANG/2026[2024-2025]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2024-2025
- Sumit Gupta, Vashi Navi Mumbai vs Ward 23(1)(1) National Faceless Assessment…ITA 1328/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Rishwam Patel, Ahmedabad vs Ward 3(2)(1), Ahmedabad, Income Tax…ITA 1617/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026