SEEMA JITENDRAKUMAR SHAH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(1), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 69A is not applicable if the cash deposits are recorded in the books of accounts and the source of deposits is explained. The assessee had provided details and explained the nexus of cash deposits with gross receipts.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited cash during the demonetization period, which the Assessing Officer added to the income under Section 69A. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of cash deposits under Section 69A was justified when the assessee provided explanations and maintained books of accounts. Applicability of Section 115BBE on such additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), ADDL/JCIT(A)-6, Chennai [in short “CIT(A)”] dated 15.04.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The Ld. CIT, NFAC has erred and was not just and proper on the facts of the case and in law in confirming the addition of 8,02,500/- u/s.69A of the Income-tax Act. Seema Jitendrakumar Shah
PRAYER
2 The addition made by Ld Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld CIT(A)-NFAC may be kindly deleted.
3 Personal hearing may be g
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026