MADHUSUDHANARAO RAMISETTY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have adopted a liberal and justice-oriented approach to condone the delay, considering the assessee's medical condition supported by a certificate. The appeals were set aside to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 based on information about substantial cash deposits. The assessee's appeals before the CIT(A) were delayed, and the CIT(A) dismissed them without condoning the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in not condoning the delay in filing the appeal due to the assessee's medical condition, and whether the reassessment proceedings were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 151,Section 69A,Section 142(1),Section 133(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH,
Before: SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the respective orders passed by the CIT (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi (for short, “CIT(A)), dated 19/02/2026, which in turn arise from the respective orders passed by the ITA 506 & 507/VIZ/2026 MADHUSUDHANARAO RAMISETTY
Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under section 147
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026