ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,GUNTUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without adjudicating the grounds on merits. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an AOP, failed to file its return of income for AY 2020-21. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution without adjudicating on merits. The assessee sought to admit additional evidence before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without deciding the grounds on merits. Whether additional evidence can be admitted at the appellate stage.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 148,Section 69,Section 68,Section 139,Section 194C,Section 250(6)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the assessee corporation, an Association of Persons (AOP) (for short, ‘the assessee’), is directed against the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, ‘the AO’) under Section 147 r.w. Section 144 r.w. Sectio
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026