SAJJA KIRAN KUMAR,GUNTUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval for issuing the notice under Section 148 was obtained from an incorrect authority, as more than three years had elapsed from the end of the assessment year. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were invalid.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 based on information about substantial cash deposits in the assessee's bank account. The AO made an addition of Rs. 26,28,610/- as unexplained money. The CIT(Appeals) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated considering the approval obtained for issuing the notice under Section 148, and whether the addition under Section 69A was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148A,Section 148,Section 69A,Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals), NFAC, Delhi (for short, “CIT(A)”) dated 19/09/2025, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (for short, “AO”) under Section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (for short,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026