SATYANARAYANA MURTHY BOLLEMPALLI,NARASAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, PALAKOLE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued by the AO was invalid as it provided less than the mandatory minimum period of 7 days for the assessee to reply. Consequently, the reopening of assessment and the reassessment order were vitiated.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenges the validity of the reopening of assessment. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a show cause notice under Section 148A(b) allowing only 6 days for the assessee to reply, which is less than the mandatory minimum of 7 days prescribed by law.
What were the issues?
Whether a show cause notice issued under Section 148A(b) allowing less than the mandatory minimum period of 7 days for reply is invalid, and if so, whether it vitiates the subsequent reopening of assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI MANJUNATHA.G, HON’BLE
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VP:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 11.04.2025, for assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: Satyanarayana Murthy Bollempalli 1. The impugned order of the learned Authorities below in so far as it is against the appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, natural justice,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148A(b)
- Venkata Durga Agencies, Kakinada vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, KakinadaITA 692/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S Mittal Alloy Castings Co., Raigarh vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), BilaspurITA 685/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Khubchandani, Raipur vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), RaipurITA 437/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Farman Sk, Malda vs I.T.O., Ward - 3(1), MaldaITA 3001/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Pramila Satyanarayan Bhandari, Surat vs DCIT, Circle-1(3), SuratITA 22/SRT/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026