S K DEVELOPERS,CHENNAI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJAHMUNDRY
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 153C was valid as incriminating material was found. However, additions for interest paid in cash could not be sustained solely on third-party evidence without corroboration, especially when denied by the assessee.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, incriminating documents related to loans and interest payments were found from a third party. The assessee firm denied receiving cash loans and paying interest, but the Assessing Officer made additions based on the third-party evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the proceedings under Section 153C were validly initiated and whether additions for interest paid in cash can be made based solely on third-party evidence without corroboration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE
PER MANJUNATHA G, AM: This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam vide DIN: ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070692893(1) dated 27-Nov-2024 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. ITA 31/VIZ/2025 S K DEVELOPERS
The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. Th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026