DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. ANOOHYA MAGANTI, VIJAYAWADA
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning capital gains arising from a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) cum General Power of Attorney (GPA). The assessee, along with co-owners, entered into a JDA cum GPA for property development, but the taxability of capital gains was disputed.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the various grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue, focusing on whether the JDA cum GPA constituted a 'transfer' for capital gains tax purposes in the year of agreement execution. The Revenue argued for taxation based on the agreement date, citing various High Court and ITAT decisions.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the execution of a Joint Development Agreement cum GPA, along with subsequent actions like obtaining permissions and receiving advances, constituted a 'transfer' of property attracting capital gains tax in the year of agreement, or if it was contingent on further developments or registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापत्तनम पीठ, धिशाखापत्तनम INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH: DIVN
BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA 252/VIZ/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2016-17) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ADARSH MAGANTI INCOME TAX 25-3-23, SRIRANGA HEIGHTS, VIJAYAWADA-520007, VIJAYAWADA-520002, ANDHRA PRADESH ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
PAN of Assessee: ANVPM2351A
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented by: Sri Nilanjan Dey, CIT(DR) प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented by: CA C Subrahmanyam
ITA 253/VIZ/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2016-17) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ANOOHYA MAGANTI INCOME TAX D.NO.59-8-7, NO.5, VIJAYAWADA-520007, VIJAYAWADA-520008, ANDHRA PRADESH ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
PAN of Assessee: BEMPM2197F
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented by: Sri Nilanjan Dey, CIT(DR) प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented by: CA C Subrahmanyam
ITA 252,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(47)
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Yousuf Shariff, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle-1(2)(2), BangaloreITA 2636/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Yousuf Shariff, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle-1(2)(2), BangaloreITA 2635/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Yousuf Shariff, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle-1(2)(2), BangaloreITA 2634/BANG/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026