SARDAR VALLABH BHAI POLYTECNIC,BHOPAL vs. EXEMPTION WARD BHOPAL, BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention that notices were not served on the correct email address, violating principles of natural justice. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return of income and the Assessing Officer made additions for unexplained investments and contractual receipts. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was effectively served with notices during assessment and appellate proceedings, and if not, whether the ex-parte orders should be set aside.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 69,Section 115BBE,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
PER ARVIND SONI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the National Faceless
Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "the ld.
CIT(A)"] for Assessment Year 2017-18 arising out of assessment order framed under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). 1
ITANo.196/Ind/2026 Sardar Vallabh Bhai Polytechnic
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee did not file the return of income under section 139(1) or in response
to under section 148 of the Income Tax for Assessment Year
2017-18. The spe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026