SUPREME LAXMI CRAFTS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE- 3, JAIPUR, CENTRAL CIRCLE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the appeal was dismissed on limitation without adjudication on merits, and the assessee claimed non-receipt of notices. In the interest of substantial justice, the assessee was granted another opportunity to present its case.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) as time-barred due to a delay of 4 months and 5 days. The assessee claimed that the assessment order was served later than stated and that statutory notices were never received, leading to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal as time-barred without considering the assessee's claim of non-receipt of notices and whether the assessee deserves another opportunity to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Udaipur-2 [hereinafter referred to as “the learned CIT(A)”] dated 08.01.2026 for the assessment year 2016-17, arising out of the assessment order dated 29.03.2022 passed under section 153C read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
I.T.A No. 293/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Supreme Laxmi Crafts Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the ACIT, Central Circle-03, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the AO”).
The grounds of appeal raised by the Assessee before us in the memorandum of appeal in Form
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026