RAM KISHAN GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD 4(2), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the revised limit of Rs. 25,00,000 specified by Notification No. S.O. 2276(E) dated 24.05.2023 should be applied retrospectively. The assessee is entitled to the full exemption claimed as it falls within this revised limit.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption of Rs. 13,81,281 under Section 10(10AA) for leave encashment. The AO restricted this exemption to Rs. 3,00,000, adding the balance to the total income. The CIT(A) upheld this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the revised exemption limit for leave encashment under Section 10(10AA) is applicable to the assessee who retired before the notification date. Whether the distinction between government and non-government employees for this exemption is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
PER : PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the learned CIT(A)”] dated 30.11.2022 for the assessment year 2020-21, arising out of the intimation dated 08.12.2021 issued under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Assistant Director of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Centre, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as “the AO”).
I.T.A No. 208/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Ram Kishan Gupta
There is a delay of 1097 days in filing this appeal before us. The assessee has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10AA)
- Mohan Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO WD 7(1), JaipurITA 228/JPR/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Abhay Hiralal Gandhi, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-6(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1955/AHD/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Usmangani Ahemadbhai Manva, Modasa vs ITO, Ward-1, ModasaITA 2526/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Usmangani Ahemadbhai Manva, Modasa vs ITO, Ward-1, ModasaITA 2525/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rasiklal Arjanbhai Kobia, Upleta vs ITO WD 2(2)(3), RKT, RajkotITA 1119/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Heard1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026