SOCIETY FOR WELFARE OF MENTALLY HANDICAPPED,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee subsequently obtained the registration and approval. Therefore, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee's applications for registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G(5) were rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals filed against the rejection of registration and approval are maintainable when the assessee has subsequently obtained the same.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prakash
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, JAIPUR (PHYSICAL HEARING) Before: Shri Kuldip Singh, Judicial Member And Shri Prakash, Accountant Member ITA Nos: 1102 & 1103/JPR/2026 Assessment Year: 2026-27
Society For Welfare of CIT(Exemption) Mentally Handicapped Jaipur 36A, Suraj Nagar Vs (East), Civil Lines Jaipur PAN: AADTS8132J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented: Ms. Aakansha Tuteja, CA Revenue Represented: Sh. Shravan Kumar Meena, CIT Date of hearing : 08-09-2026 Date of pronouncement : 09-09-2026 आदेश/ORDER PER BENCH:
These appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(E)”] dated 13.02.2026 who had rejected the applications of the assessee for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and approval under section 80G(5) of the Act. 2. The Authorized Representative for the assessee has filed an application for withdrawal of both these appeals since the assessee has been
I.T.A No. 1102 1103-JPR-2026/JPR/2026 Page 2 Society for Welfare of Mentally Handicapped
granted the above-referred registration and the approval vide order of the learned CIT(E) dated 06.07.2026. 3. Considering the application submitted before us and the representation made by the learned AR, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 09-09-2026
Sd/- Sd/-
(KULDIP SINGH) (PRAKASH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 09/09/2026 *Ganesh Kr., Sr. PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से,
सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, t;iqj
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026