VIJAY KUMAR MITTAL,KALKA vs. ITO PARWANOO, PARWANOO
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It was held that the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to present their case by the CIT(A) and the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the ITAT was filed 90 days late. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) failed to provide adequate opportunity to present their case and erred in concurring with the Assessing Officer's assessment under Section 144.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in not providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to present their case and in concurring with the assessment under Section 144.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, =
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)NFAC [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 13.10.2025 passed for assessment year 2010-11. 2. At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the appeal filed by the assessee is barred by limitation by 90 days for which application explaining the delay has been placed on record. It was submitted that the delay was neither intentional nor deliberate and occurred due to unavoidable circumstances. The ld. DR did not A.Y.2010-11 2 seriously object to the condonation of delay. Considering the contents of the affida
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026