SHAMJI RAMJI CHAUHAN,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had sent notices to an incorrect email address, leading to the assessee's non-compliance. Therefore, the matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened based on information about accommodation entries for LTCG/STCG in the sale of Kushal Limited shares. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 6,30,730/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without a proper hearing due to incorrect email communication and whether the reassessment proceedings and addition were justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA & SHRI SANJAY KUMAR
PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] dated 23.04.2025 for the Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2018-19 in the proceeding u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred as “the Act”].
The brief facts of the case are that the case of the assessee was reopened on the basis of information received by the AO that the assessee has taken accommodation entry in the form of LTCG/STCG in the sale of scrip of Kushal Limited. The AO had examined the transactions Shamji Ramji Chau
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026