SREE KUMAR TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED,INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MADURAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE, MADURAI, INCOME TAX OFFICE, MADURAI
What were the facts?
The assessee company did not file its return of income for AY 2011-12. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for cash credits, rental income, and capital gains. The assessee claimed set-off of unabsorbed depreciation, which was denied by the AO and CIT(A).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that unabsorbed depreciation is governed by Section 32(2) and can be set off against income from other heads, irrespective of whether business was carried on or returns were filed for intervening years. The addition of Rs. 21,00,000 was deleted, while the addition of Rs. 16,10,000 was sustained.
What were the issues?
Whether unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against income from other heads when business is discontinued, and whether cash credits are unexplained.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 32(2),Section 68,Section 72,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 144,Section 264
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM : The present appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 12.11.2025 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”], arising from the assessment order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Corporate Circle, Madurai [here
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(2)
- Karnavati Rolling Mills Private Limited… vs The ITO, Ward-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1714/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Vts Tf Air Systems Private Limited… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1)(1)…ITTPA 710/BANG/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026AY 2022-2023
- Gluhend India Private Limited, Delhi vs DCIT - 3(1)(1), MumbaiITA 271/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed27 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Shiv Vijay Processors Private… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2 1 3, SuratITA 1241/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Nayon Exports, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 19(2)(4), Mumbai, Piramal ChamberITA 2573/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026