KAIROS PROPERTIES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT WD 15(1)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that CCDs retain their character as debt until actual conversion into equity and cannot be re-characterized as equity from inception for transfer pricing purposes. The Tribunal also found the assessee's effective interest rate to be within the arm's length range based on domestic lending benchmarks.
What were the facts?
The assessee company issued Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) to its Associated Enterprise and paid interest thereon. The Assessing Officer (AO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) treated the CCDs as equity and determined the arm's length interest rate at Nil, leading to a disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether Compulsorily Convertible Debentures can be re-characterized as equity for transfer pricing purposes, and what is the appropriate benchmark for interest on INR-denominated debt issued to a foreign AE.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92A,Section 94B,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 144C(5),Section 144C(13)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & MS. RATNA DASGUPTA
PER: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, (JM): The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department [in short, “Ld. AO”] under section 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( in short “the Act”) dated 25.10.2024 passed by pursuant to the directions dated 29.09.2024,
ITA 6760/MUM/2024
issued by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (DRP-1) Mumbai-2 (in short “Ld. DRP”) passed under section 144C(5) of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92A
- Mobitech Creations Private Limited, South… vs DCIT, New DelhiITA 1005/DEL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2021-2022
- Lama Rice Private Limited, Delhi vs DCIT Circle 13 (1), DelhiITTPA 66/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Sas Institute (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs ACIT, Circle- 1(3)(1), MumbaiITA 6672/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2010-11
- Sas Institute (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs ACIT, Circle- 1(3)(1), MumbaiITA 6671/MUM/2019[2008-09]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- Freyr Software Services Private Limited… vs DCIT, Circle-8(1), HyderabadITTPA 345/HYD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026