ICE SKAING ASSOCIATION,DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration. The CIT(Exemption) is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the assessee and consider all evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application in Form No.12AB(1)(b)(ii) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) due to a lack of requisite submissions. No one appeared for the assessee during the appeal hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) properly rejected the assessee's application without granting sufficient opportunity for compliance and hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Form No.12AB(1)(b)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5262/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) Ice Skaing Association Vs. CIT(Exemption) 7/19, Ansari Road, Civic Centre, Minto Road, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAATI4489D Assessee by : None Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Mahajan, Sr DR Date of Hearing 23/06/2026 Date of pronouncement 09/09/2026
O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, J. M: The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order
dated 09.03.2026 passed by the CIT(E), Delhi whereby and whereunder in
the absence of requisite submissions made by the applicant in support of
the application in Form No.12AB(1) (b) (ii) of the Act the same stood rejected.
None appeared for the assessee at the time of call.
Having regard to the part submission been filed by the assessee before
the Ld. CIT(E) and deficiencies not been removed by the assessee, the issue
is remitted to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for consideration of the same afresh
upon compliance being made by the assessee. The Ld. CIT(E) is further
directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and to
2 ITA No. 5262/Del/2026 Ice Skaing Association
consider the evidence on record and any other evidence which the assessee
may choose to file at the time of hearing of the matter. The assessee’s
appeal is thus, allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 09/09/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 09/09/2026 R. Naheed, Sr PS Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026