SKYTECH CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee paid lease rent to development authorities without deducting TDS, claiming exemption for local authorities. The AO treated the assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS and charged interest.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was liable to deduct TDS on lease rent paid to development authorities, as per Supreme Court precedent. However, the AO should have provided an opportunity to demonstrate eligibility under the proviso to Section 201(1).
What were the issues?
Whether lease rent paid to development authorities is liable for TDS under Section 194-I and whether the assessee should be given an opportunity to prove eligibility under the proviso to Section 201(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194-I,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 10(20),Section 10(20A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, G: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
Per Renu Jauhri, Accountant Member:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 08.01.2026 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeal), ADDL/JCIT (A)-1 Pune, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT(A)] arising out of the Order dated 03.03.2021 passed under section 201 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by ITO, ward-77(3), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AO’) pertaining to Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014-15. ITA No.- 3179/Del/2026 Skytech construc"on Pvt. Ltd.
The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“ 1. Action of Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194-I
- Chandra Mani Tripathi Vijay Pratap Singh… vs Income Tax Officer 4(1) Lko New, LucknowITA 512/LKW/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Anita Grover, Delhi vs Income Tax Officer, DelhiITA 4305/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Smash Factor Sports Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITSSA 427/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Smash Factor Sports Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITSSA 426/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Dinesh Kanhialal Jain, Mumbai vs DCIT Circle - 41(2)(1), MumbaiITA 139/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026