KULDEEP SINGH,JALALABAD, FAZILKA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), ABOHAR, PUNJAB, ABOHAR, PUNJAB

ITA 163/ASR/2025Status: HeardITAT Amritsar10 September 2026AY 2019-203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal, in the interest of justice, decided to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer. The assessee was directed to cooperate and provide necessary evidence during the fresh proceedings.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte due to notices being sent to an old email ID, despite an updated one being provided. The assessee claimed they were unaware of the hearings and thus couldn't present their case.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity of being heard due to improper service of notices, leading to an ex-parte order.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, AMRITSAR

Before: SHRI LALIET KUMAR & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

Hearing: 08.09.2026Pronounced: 10.09.2026

PER LALIET KUMAR, JM This is an appeal filed by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) NFAC [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 10.01.2025 for the assessment year 2019-20. 2. The ld. counsel for the assessee, at the very outset stated that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in upholding the ITA-163/ASR/2025 A.Y. 2019-20 2

addition of Rs. 27,80,538/- as unexplained investment under section 69

of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the said addition is unjustified based on the facts and circumstances of the case. It was subm

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 69

All 9,011 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →