BAPA SITARAM COAL,MORBI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, MORBI, MORBI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued beyond the 'surviving time' as per the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajeev Bansal. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings were quashed.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings against the assessee for AY 2017-18 based on information regarding cash payments for coal purchases. The assessee denied these transactions. The AO made an addition of Rs. 51,29,000/- as unexplained expenditure, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, specifically concerning the time limits and the application of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 69C,Section 115BBE,Section 148A(b),Section 148A(d),Section 151
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2017- 18, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), dated 25.02.2026, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, on 25.05.2023. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026