ATIDA AGRAWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-6(3), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing adequate opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution. The assessee contended that hearing notices were not sent to the correct email address and that the appeal was not decided on merits despite submission of additional evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without proper notice. Whether the appeal should have been decided on merits with the submitted additional evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified in the provided text
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR “SMC” BENCH, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRAKASH, ACCOUNTANCT MEMBER
PER : KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
The Appellant, Atida Agrawal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘assessee’) by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 17.10.2024 passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1 Noida [hereinafter referred to as the ‘JCIT(A)’] qua assessment year 2012-13 on the grounds inter- alia that:- “1. The Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred on facts and in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee by holding that assessee is not interested in I.T.A No. 719/JPR/2026 Page No 2 Atida Agrawal
pursuing the appeal without providing adequate opportunity of hearing in as much as the hearing notices dt. 10.09.2024,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026