IL & FS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED(FORMERLY MAYTAS INFRA LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that due to the NCLAT's interim stay order, the appeals could not be proceeded with. The previous dismissal was based on incorrect assumptions about IBC proceedings.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had previously dismissed appeals in limine due to a misunderstanding of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applicability. Upon recalling the order, the Tribunal considered an NCLAT interim stay order against proceedings involving IL & FS.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals can be proceeded with when there is an NCLAT stay order against the assessee. Whether the earlier dismissal based on IBC provisions was erroneous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 241, Section 242
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ", हैदराबाद INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD B-BENCH, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1887 to 1889/HYD/2019 & ITA.Nos.1890 to 1894/HYD./2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 & 2012-2013 to 2015-2016 & 2009-2010 IL & FS ENGINEERING DY. COMMISSIONER AND CONSTRUCTION OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CENTRAL CIRCLE-9 LIMITED(FORMERLY 8TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR MAYTAS INFRA BHAVAN, LIMITED) BASHEERBAGH 8-2-120/113/3, 1ST HYDERABAD-, Vs. FLOOR, BLOCK B, TELANGANA SANALI INFO PARK, AND The ACIT, ROAD NO.2, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD-, Central Circle-3(2), TELANGANA HYDERABAD. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent ITA.Nos.130 to 135/Hyd./2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years 2009-2010 to 2014-2015 The ACIT, IL & FS ENGINEERING Central Circle-3(2), AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED HYDERABAD. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent
ITA 1887 to 1894/HYD/2019 AND ITA 130 to 135/Hyd./2020
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AABCM3722F
अपीलाथ" "ारा/Appellant represented by: CA K C Devdas ""थ" "ारा/Respondent CIT-DR Waseem UR Rehman represented by: सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of heari
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026