AIROLI ITP DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), MUMBAI CITY
What were the facts?
The assessee issued unsecured Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) to an associated enterprise, incurring significant interest expenditure. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) re-characterized these CCDs as equity, deeming the interest payment at arm's length to be Nil.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) are debt instruments until their conversion into equity. The re-characterization of CCDs as equity by the TPO was beyond the scope of transfer pricing and lacked the procedural safeguards of GAAR provisions.
What were the issues?
Whether Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) can be re-characterized as equity by the Transfer Pricing Officer for determining arm's length price, and if the GAAR provisions are applicable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 144C(5),Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 270A,Section 95,Section 96,Section 98,Section 144BA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & MS. RATNA DASGUPTA
PER: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, (JM): The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department [for brevity “Ld. AO”], order passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C (13) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’), date of order 25.10.2024. The impugned order originated
ITA 6708/MUM/2024
by pursuing to the order of the Ld. Comm
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026