SHRUTI KULSHRESHTHA,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 5(2)(4), NOIDA

P a g e | 1 ITA No.7663/Del/2026 Shruti Kulshreshtha (AY: 2022-23) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.7663/Del/2026 Assessment Year: 2022-23 Shruti Kulshreshtha Vs. Income Tax Officer, C/o Dr. Kapil Goel Ward -5(2)(4) Adv. G-8/5 Sector 11 Noida, Opposite SFS Appartments Uttar Pradesh Delhi – 110085 PAN: DFNPK3681E (Appellant) (Respondent)

Assessee by Dr. Kapil Goel, Adv. (virtual) Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR

Date of hearing 20.08.2026 Date of pronouncement 20.08.2026 ORDER This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2022-23, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2026-27/1091326077(1), dated 22.07.2026 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

P a g e | 2 ITA No.7663/Del/2026 Shruti Kulshreshtha (AY: 2022-23) 2. Learned departmental representative vehemently argues in support of both the learned lower authorities’ respective assessment and lower appellate findings that the assessee/appellant herein has rightly been assessed for having made cash payment of Rs.5,06,000/- to Bhutani Group as per departmental authorities’ action having found/seized the corresponding incriminating material in search action on 04.01.2024. 3. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s and the Revenue’s respective vehement submissions against and in support of the impugned addition. There is hardly any dispute between the parties that both the learned lower authorities have more gone by their respective assumptions and presumptions than having discussed any incriminating material indicating the assessee to have made the impugned on-money payment to the searched party in question. It is further emphasized that there is no indication in the assessment order or in the lower appellate discussion discussing any actual evidence against the assessee to buttress the on-money allegation. I thus find no merit in the impugned addition of Rs.5,06,000/- which is hereby deleted in very terms.

P a g e | 3 ITA No.7663/Del/2026 Shruti Kulshreshtha (AY: 2022-23) 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20th August, 2026

Sd/- (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 10th September, 2026. Rohit, Sr. PS Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi