MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 17 (1), DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2854/DEL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 September 2026AY 2015-165 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 on 28.07.2022 was indeed time-barred for AY 2015-16, following the Supreme Court's decision in Rajeev Bansal. Consequently, the assessment order based on this notice was also deemed not tenable.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed in limine by the CIT(A) due to a delay in filing. The assessee challenged the validity of the notice issued under Section 148, arguing it was time-barred for Assessment Year 2015-16.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 was time-barred. The Tribunal also considered the applicability of TOLA and the Supreme Court's ruling in Ashish Agarwal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI VIMAL KUMAR & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Jain, CA
For Respondent: Shri Tarun Sharda, Sr. DR
Hearing: 17.08.2026

ITA No. 2854/DEL/2026 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2854/DEL/2026 Assessment Year: 2015-16 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED, Vs ASSESSMENT UNIT, B-243-245, Khasra No.593, Rajiv Nagar . Income Tax Department, Extn., Bhalaswa, Delhi 110042. Ward 17(1), Delhi 110002. PAN No. AAECC1555H Appellant Respondent Assessee by Shri Sandeep Jain, CA Revenue by Shri Tarun Sharda, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 17.08.2026 Pronouncement on 10.09.2026 O R D E R PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

This appeal arises from order dated 23.01.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”), by NFAC.

1.1 In this case, the Ld. AO initiated proceedings u/s 147 by issuing a notice u/s 148, under the new regime, on 28.07.2022. Thereafter, an addition of Rs. 641,00,000/- was made on account of alleged accommodation entries.

1.2 The assessee approached the Ld. CIT(A) whereby he filed the appeal with a delay of 204 days. This delay was not condoned and the appeal was dismissed inlimine.

ITA No. 2854/DEL/2026 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED 1.3 The aggrieved assessee has approached the ITAT initially with five grounds challenging the impugned actions of the authorities below and later on filed two additional grounds as under: -

1.

“On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming addition made by AO against the time barred notice issued u/s 148 dated 28.07.2022 and time barred order u/s 148A(d) dated 28.07.2022. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in confirming the addition made by AO despite approval by Ld. PCCIT being defective and mechanical in nature while approving notice u/s 148 and order u/s 148A(d).” 2. Before us the Ld. AR requested for admitting the additional grounds since the facts to adjudicate the same were already on record and following the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Company Limited reported in 229 ITR 383 (SC), the additional grounds deserved to be admitted. The Ld. AR argued that the basic relevant dates in the case were as under: (i) Notice issued u/s 148 (old regime)- 28.06.2021; (ii) This was thereafter converted to a notice under the new regime following the case of Ashish Agarwal reported in 444 ITR 1 (SC), vide letter dated 25.05.2022; (iii) The assessee filed his response on 10.06.2022; (iv) Order u/s 148A(d) of the Act and notice u/s 148 both were issued on 28.07.2022. It was argued that since this matter pertained to AY 2015-16 then the notice issued on 28.07.2022 was clearly time barred. The Ld. AR relied on the case of Rajeev Bansal reported in 469 ITR 46 (SC) to canvass the point that any notice for AY 2015-16 issued on or after 1st April, 2021 needed to

ITA No. 2854/DEL/2026 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED be dropped following paragraph 19F of this judgment. It was the submission that since this notice was issued on 28.07.2022, hence, it was clearly time barred. 2.1 The Ld. DR relied on the orders of the authorities below and stated that this matter should be remanded back to the file of Ld. CIT(A) since the appeal was dismissed inlimine. 3. We have considered the rival submissions and have gone through the records before us. The additional grounds are admitted following the case of NTPC (supra). We need to recapitulate the chronology of dates as under: - Assessment Year 2015-16 Last date to issue notice u/s 148 as per 31.03.2022 amended Law s. 149 and as per 1st [TOLA not applicable] proviso to amended s. 149 Notice u/s 148 issued under Old Law 28.06.2021 Notice providing material in pursuance 25.05.2022 of Hon’ble Supreme Court’s order in Ashish Agarwal’s case. Reply filed by the assessee on 10.06.2022 Date of notice u/s 148 28.07.2022 At this stage, we may also refer to the relevant portion of the judgment in the case of Rajeev Bansal (supra) as under: “19. Mr. N Venkataraman, Learned Additional Solicitor General of India, made the following submissions on behalf of the Revenue: a) Parliament enacted TOLA as a free-standing legislation to provide relief and relaxation to both the assesses and the Revenue during the time of COVID-19. TOLA seeks to relax actions and proceedings that could not be completed or complied with within the original time limit a specified under the Income-tax Act; b) Section 149 of the new regime provides free crucial benefits to the assessee: (1) the four-year time limit for all situations has been reduced to three years; (ii) the first proviso to Section 149 ensures that re-assessment for previous assessment years cannot be undertaken beyond six years; and (iii) the monetary threshold

ITA No. 2854/DEL/2026 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED of Rupees fifty lakhs will apply to the re assessment for previous assessment years; c) The relaxations provided u/s 3(1) of TOLA apply “notwithstanding anything contained in the specified Act”. Section 3(1), therefore, overrides the time limits for issuing a notice u/s 148 r.w.s. 149 of the Income Tax Act; d) TOLA does not extend the life of the old regime. It merely provides a relaxation for the completion or compliance of actions following the procedure laid down under the new regime; e) The Finance Act 2021 substituted the old regime for re- assessment with a new regime. The first proviso to Section 149 does not expressly bar the application of TOLA Section 3 of TOLA applies to the entire Income Tax Act, including Sections 149 and 151 of the new regime. Once the first proviso to Section 149(1)(6) is read with TOLA, then all the notices issued between 1 April 2021 and 30 June 2021 pertaining to assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 will be within the period of limitation as explained in the tabulation below: AY Within 3 years Expiry of Within six years Expiry of Limitation read Limitation read with TOLA for with TOLA for (2) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 2013-14 31.03.2017 TOLA not 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 applicable 2014-15 31.03.2018 TOLA not 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 applicable 2015-16 31.03.2019 TOLA not 31.03.2022 TOLA not applicable applicable 2016-17 31.03.2020 30.06.2021 31.03.2023 TOLA not applicable 2017-18 31.03.2021 30.06.2021 31.03.2024 TOLA not applicable f) The Revenue concedes that for the AY 2015-16, all notices issued on or after 1st April, 2021 will have to be dropped as they will not fall for completion during the period prescribed under TOLA; [Emphasis added] g) Section 2 of TOLA defines “specified Act” to mean and include the Income Tax Act. The new regime, which came into effect on 1st April, 2021, is now part of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, TOLA continues to apply to the Income Tax Act even after 1st April, 2021; and h) Ashish Agarwal (supra) treated Section 148 notices issued by the Revenue between 1st April, 2021 and 30th June 2021 as show-cause notices in terms of Section 148A(6). Thereafter, the Revenue issued notices u/s 148 of the new regime between July and August 2022. Invalidation of the Section 148 notices issued under the

ITA No. 2854/DEL/2026 MILESIDE ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED new regime on the ground that they were issued beyond the time limit specified under the Income-tax Act read with TOLA will completely frustrate the judicial exercise undertaken by this Court in Ashish Agarwal (supra)”. Accordingly, there is no hesitation in holding that the notice issued on 28.07.2022 is barred by limitation. Consequently, the assessment order following this notice is also not tenable in the eyes of law. 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 10.09.2026

Sd/- Sd/- (VIMAL KUMAR) (SANJAY AWASTHI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 10.09.2026 *Kavita Arora, Sr. P.S. Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →