SAVITRI DEVIPROPERTIES PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits, noting the ex-parte nature of the previous order. The assessee was directed to pay a cost of Rs. 5,000/-.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 148 for non-declaration of capital gains on property sale. The assessee failed to represent itself before the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte without considering the merits of the case is sustainable. Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to represent its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH: PATNA
Before: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S&Shri Gopalan Gurusamy]
Per Gopalan Gurusamy, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the Act dated 16.01.2026 for the AY 2020-21. 2. The Assessing Officer had initiated proceedings u/s 148 as the assessee has not declared the capital gain on the sale of immovable property. Before the Assessing Officer, there was no representation as a result, the Assessing Officer determined total income at Rs.
2 Assessment Year: 2018-19 Savitri Devi Properties Pvt. Ltd. 2,3
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026