FILATEX FASHIONS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that once books of account are rejected and income is estimated, separate additions cannot be made based on entries in those rejected books. The issue of loan/advance from a specific party was restored to the AO for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee's books of account were rejected, and income was estimated. Additions were made under Section 68 for share capital, share premium, and increase in current liabilities. The assessee also challenged the validity of the notice issued under Section 143(2).
What were the issues?
Whether additions under Section 68 for current liabilities are sustainable after rejection of books of account and estimation of income. Validity of notice under Section 143(2).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE & SHRI MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA, HON’BLE
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM: The present appeal filed by the assessee company is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-12, dated 09.09.2025, which in turn arises from the assessment order passed by the AO under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’), dated 29.12.2018 for assessment year
ITA 1616/HYD/2025 FILATEX FASHIONS LI
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026