VEKATESHPURAM TARAPORE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,TAMIL NADU, INDIA vs. EXEMPTIONS WARD 3 CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2428/CHNY/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 September 20263 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the lack of knowledge of the assessee's management and the accountant's oversight, decided to grant one more opportunity. The appeals were remitted back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB and Section 80G of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the applications for non-furnishing of mandatory documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of registration under Section 12AB and 80G was justified due to non-furnishing of documents, and if a further opportunity should be granted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: MS. PADMAVATHY.S & SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI

For Respondent: Ms. Nayani Swapna, CIT

आदेश / O R D E R

PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: These appeals by the assessee are against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) (in short “CIT(E)), Chennai, dated 18.03.2026 denying

ITA No.2427 & 2428/Chny/2026 Vekateshpuram Tarapore Educational Trust :2: the registration u/s. 12AB and registration u/s. 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

The assessee is a public charitable trust established for the advancement of education and community welfare. The primary objective of the assessee includes establishing educational institutions and providing accessible learning opportunities to students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The assessee made an application in Form 10AB on 30.09.2025 seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. The CIT(E) called on the assessee to furnish the following documents: i) Trust deed/instrument creating or establishing the institution. ii) Financials and note on activities iii) Copy of approval u/s. 12A/12AA of the Act obtained in the old regime i.e. prior to 01.04.2021

3.

The CIT(E) held that since the assessee did not furnish the above mandatory documents required for examining the objects and genuineness of the activities, the application seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act is to be rejected. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(E).

4.

We heard the parties and perused the material on record. The ld.AR submitted that the assessee is managed by persons who do not have much knowledge about Income tax proceedings and therefore wholly dependent on the accountant who was handling the tax matters. The ld.AR further submitted that the notices were received by the accountant who did not respond properly to the details called and related compliances. The ld.AR, therefore, prayed for one opportunity to submit the details with an undertaking that if given an opportunity the assessee would comply with the

ITA No.2427 & 2428/Chny/2026 Vekateshpuram Tarapore Educational Trust :3: submissions of details and respond to the notices. Considering the over all facts and circumstances of case, in the interest of natural justice, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee. Accordingly, we remit the appeal back to the CIT(E) with a direction to call for necessary details to decide the issue of registration u/s. 12AB of the Act in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to file all the relevant details as may be called for without seeking unnecessary adjournments.

5.

With regard to the rejection of approval u/s. 80G of the Act by the CIT(E) we notice that the CIT(E) rejected the said application also for the same reason that the assessee did not submit any details. Considering that we have remitted the issue of registration u/s.12AB of the Act back to the CIT(E), we are remitting the issue of approval u/s. 80G of the Act also back to the CIT(E) with similar directions.

6.

In result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 11th day of September, 2026 at Chennai.

Sd/- Sd/- (मनु कुमार िग!र) (पदमावती यस) (Manu Kumar Giri) (Padmavathy.S) �ाियक सद� / Judicial Member लेखा सद� /Accountant Member चे ई/Chennai, िदनांक/Dated: 11th September, 2026. JPV, Sr. P.S EJTADA Digitally signed by EJTADA DURGA NARESH DURGA आदेश की �ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy to: Date: 2026.09.17 NARESH 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 10:29:47 +05'30' 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु$/CIT, Chennai/Madurai/Coimbatore/Salem 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →