ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. JYOTI CNC AUTOMATION LIMITED, RAJKOT
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made on account of unexplained cash credits and expenditure. The Assessing Officer treated a loan of Rs. 76,57,520/- as unexplained cash credit and the interest thereon as unexplained expenditure, based on information from an investigation wing regarding accommodation entries.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had discharged its primary onus by providing documentary evidence of transactions through banking channels, including ledger accounts and bank statements. The Tribunal also noted that TDS was deducted on interest paid and the loan was repaid.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions related to unexplained cash credits and expenditure when transactions were conducted through banking channels. Whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 35(2AB) despite the prescribed authority not submitting Form 3CL.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench, Rajkot
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned three appeals filed by the Revenue, pertaining to assessment years (AYs) 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2022-23, are directed against the separate orders, under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NAC)
Delhi/Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [in short ‘NFAC/Ld.CI
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- Rajeshkumar Shah, Navagam, Udhana vs Income Tax Officer, AdajanITA 283/SRT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Jabar Bhuraram Chaudhary, Lunawada vs Income Tax Office Ward 1, LunawadaITA 2640/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Prafulldan Motising Gadhvi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 4(2)(1) Ahmedabad, Pratyaksha Kar…ITA 2589/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sea Side Hotel Private Limited, Mumbai vs Ward 11(2)(1), MumbaiITA 7336/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026