JITENDRA SHUKLA,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI, HARDOI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found the initiation of reassessment proceedings to be valid. However, it set aside the NFAC's order confirming an addition of Rs. 33,15,894/- due to a lack of thorough examination. The matter was remanded to the NFAC for de novo examination.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department reopened the assessee's case under Section 147 due to a significant difference between bank credits and declared gross receipts. The Assessing Officer added the difference to the total income. The NFAC partly allowed the appeal, sustaining one addition and deleting another to avoid double taxation.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and whether the addition of unexplained cash credit was correctly confirmed by the lower appellate authority.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 12.02.2026, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2012-13. 2.0 The brief facts of the case are that the Income Tax Department was in possession of information that, during the year under consideration, there was a total credit of Rs.64,28,244/- (Rs.52,18,256/- in the bank account No.022010100006750 maintained with Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Gondwa, Hardoi and Rs.12,09,988/- in bank account No.022510100011031 maintained with Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Kothawan, Hardoi, whereas the gross receipts declared by the assessee in the return filed on 23.10.2012 for the year under consideration, was of Rs.31,12,350/-. On the basis of this ITA No.486/LKW/2026 information, the case of the assessee was reopened under sec
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026