BHAGWANDAS PARVANI,NADIAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, NADIAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in a presumptive taxation scheme under Section 44AD, the disclosed turnover encompasses all business receipts, and the net profit rate accounts for all expenses. Therefore, the addition of purchases as unexplained expenditure was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, who opted for presumptive taxation under Section 44AD, had purchases of ₹1,80,000 recorded in his cash book. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings and added this amount as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C, which was upheld by the CIT(A) for non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether purchases recorded in the cash book can be treated as unexplained expenditure under Section 69C for an assessee opting for presumptive taxation under Section 44AD. Whether reassessment proceedings were validly initiated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 69C,Section 44AD,Section 115BBE,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 274,Section 271AAC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the Order, dated 23/09/2025, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] whereby the Learned CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 27/03/2025, passed under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] for the Assessment Year 2020-2021. 2. There is a delay of 93 days in filing the present appeal. We have taken into consideration the explanation offered by the Assessee for delay in filing the present appeal. We are of the view that the Assessee wa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026