PARULBEN NIKHILKUMAR DHRUVA,BORIAVI vs. THE ITO, WARD- 1, NADIAD, NADIAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not wish to pursue the appeal and had requested permission to withdraw it. Considering the assessee's request, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the NFAC under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2020-21. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed against the NFAC's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
आदेशानुसार : "ी नरे" "साद िस"ा, लेखा सद"
यह अपील अपीलाथ"/असेसी "ारा रा""ीय फेसलेस अपील क"" (NFAC), िद"ी [इसके प"ात् “सीआईटी(ए)” के "प म" संदिभ"त] "ारा आयकर अिधिनयम [इसके प"ात् “अिधिनयम” के "प म" संदिभ"त] की धारा 147 सहपिठत धारा 144B के अंतग"त काय"वाही
I.T.A No. 1674/Ahd/2026 A.Y. 2020-21 म", िनधा"रण वष" (A.Y.) 2020-21 के िलए िदनांक 08.12.2025 को पा"रत आदेश के िव"" दायर की गई है। 2. सुनवाई के दौरान, "ी िधनाल शाह, माननीय अिधकृत "ितिनिध (Ld. AR) ने ""ुत िकया िक अपीलाथ"/असेसी वत"मान अपील को आगे नहीं बढ़ाना चाहता है तथा वत"मान अपील वापस लेने की अनुमित "दान िकए जाने का अनुरोध िकया। अपीलाथ"/असेसी "ारा वत"मान अपील वापस लेने के अनुरोध के साथ िदनांक 03.09.202
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026