DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VADDOARA, VADODARA vs. P MANEKLAL SONI AND CO., DAHOD
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made an addition of INR 1,23,56,000/- under Section 69A as unexplained money, attributing it to cash deposits during demonetization. The assessee claimed these deposits were from cash sales, supported by their cash book and sales ledger.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 69A cannot be invoked when cash deposits are duly recorded in the books of accounts and the income from sales has already been offered to tax. The Assessing Officer had not rejected the books of accounts or disputed the sales, purchases, or stock position.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits, which are explained as cash sales recorded in the books of account and offered to tax, can be treated as unexplained money under Section 69A. Whether Section 69A is applicable when the books of account are not rejected and sales are not disputed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69A,Section 143(3),Section 133(6),Section 145(3),Section 68
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the Order, dated 23/09/2025, passed by the Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Appeals)-12 Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] whereby the Learned CIT(A) had partly allowed the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 16/12/2019, passed under Section 143(3)of the Income Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’] for the Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. The Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal:
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, JunagadhITA 836/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026