RAMESH PRAHLAD PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), THANE, THANE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 8243/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 September 2026AY 2014-1524 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the lower authorities failed to properly examine the nature of the transactions and the assessee's role. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication to determine the ownership of funds and the taxable income, if any.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹2,68,30,552 on account of credits in an account held by the assessee with a co-operative credit society. The assessee claimed these transactions were part of an angadia or money-remittance activity, and only commission should be taxed.

What were the issues?

Whether the entire credits in the assessee's account represent unexplained investment, or if they are part of an angadia business where only commission is taxable. The validity of the reopening proceedings was also considered.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura (Virtual Appearance)
For Respondent: Shri Azhar Kabir (Sr. DR)
Hearing: 06.07.2026Pronounced: 15.09.2026

आदेश की प्रतितलतप अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 4. दिभागीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण DR, ITAT, Mumbai

P a g e | 24 ITA No. 8243/Mum/2025 A.Y. 2014-15 Ramesh Prahlad Patel 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. सत्यादपि प्रदि //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अतधकरण/ ITAT, Bench, Mumbai.

More judgments on Section 69

All 9,011 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →