JAGDISHBHAI KABABHAI SAKARIA,JETPUR, DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that while Supreme Court and Gujarat High Court decisions suggest interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is part of compensation, the assessee failed to provide complete details and the relevant award. Therefore, the issue was restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee received interest on additional compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land. The Assessing Officer added this interest to the total income, and the CIT(A) upheld the addition. The assessee appealed, claiming the interest was part of the compensation and thus exempt.
What were the issues?
Whether interest received on additional compensation for compulsory acquisition of land is taxable or exempt, and whether the assessee provided sufficient documentation to prove its claim.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT “DB” BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-SHRI SONJOY SARMA
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
-
The captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”), National Faceless Appeal Centre (in short “NFAC”), Delhi vide order dated 19.11.2025 relevant to Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
1] The grounds raised in this appeal are without prejudice to one another. 2] The Ld. A.O. grievously erred in law and on facts in taxing the amount of interest received on additional compensation on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land granted by the Civil Co
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 28
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- The Vijapur Taluka Co-Operative Purchase… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PatanITA 925/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT, Circle-4, Patna vs Amit Kumar Singh, PatnaITA 95/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-4, Patna vs Amit Kumar Singh, PatnaITA 88/PAT/2020[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Vishal Oil and Lubricants Co vs The Commissioner of Customs (Import)W.P.(C)-7004/202628 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026