NAKUL PAUL,UTTAR DINAJPUR vs. I.T.O., WARD - 2(4), RAIGANJ
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the CIT(A) order was ex-parte and did not decide all grounds on merits. The case was restored to the Assessing Officer for de-novo assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 75 days, citing reasons of not being properly guided by the previous Chartered Accountant. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) warrants restoration for de-novo assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The present Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 19.02.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) pertaining to the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. There is a delay of 75 days in filing the captioned Appeal. The Assessee filed an application along with affidavit for condonation of delay narrating the reasons which are reproduced as under: -
“1. That the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC has passed the appellate order for the A.Y. 2018-19 on 19.02.2026. 60 days from 01.03.2026 elapsed on 29.04.2026, so the due date for presenting the appeal has expired before. The appeal has been filed o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026