LUMIERE AUTOMOBILES LLP,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 37(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment proceedings were without jurisdiction because Section 151A of the Act, which governs faceless assessment, became effective from March 29, 2022, while the assessment order was dated March 25, 2022. Therefore, the assessment order could not be sustained.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return of income for AY 2017-18, leading to a reassessment notice under Section 147. The assessment was completed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) without the assessee's compliance. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the reassessment proceedings and the assessment order were validly passed considering the effective date of Section 151A and the jurisdiction of the NFAC. Another issue concerned the addition of cash deposits and disallowance of expenses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 151A,Section 69A,Section 40A(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 12.12.2025 for the AY 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:-
“1. For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessment proceeding completed u/s 147 when neither of the notices nor assessment order were served on the assessee.
For that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the reopening of assessment when the conditions laid down u/s 147 was not fulfilled.
For that the reassessment completed by NFAC was without juri iction and therefore the entire reassessment is liabl
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026